<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A new feed to read</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=936</link>
	<description>Helping PC users make sense of Microsoft software since 1991</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dwight Silverman</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=936&#038;cpage=1#comment-2330</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=936#comment-2330</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t -- anymore.

Movable Type autogenerates Atom feeds for each blog. We weren&#039;t linking them on our blogs, but they&#039;re accessible if you know what to do. I didn&#039;t realize they were full-feed until I saw this, and now they&#039;re not. Thanks for the head&#039;s up!

As I&#039;ve said before, full-feed doesn&#039;t work when you rely on people to see/click your on-site ads for revenue. They&#039;re great if you&#039;re a blogger and your main concern is getting your voice heard. Commercial sites like the Chronicle need folks to actually pay a visit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t &#8212; anymore.</p>
<p>Movable Type autogenerates Atom feeds for each blog. We weren&#8217;t linking them on our blogs, but they&#8217;re accessible if you know what to do. I didn&#8217;t realize they were full-feed until I saw this, and now they&#8217;re not. Thanks for the head&#8217;s up!</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, full-feed doesn&#8217;t work when you rely on people to see/click your on-site ads for revenue. They&#8217;re great if you&#8217;re a blogger and your main concern is getting your voice heard. Commercial sites like the Chronicle need folks to actually pay a visit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=936&#038;cpage=1#comment-2331</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=936#comment-2331</guid>
		<description>Just so you&#039;re aware, Dwight, I wasn&#039;t using any secret Jedi tricks. FeedDemon auto-discovered two feeds and gave me a choice when I clicked the orange RSS button. It didn&#039;t tell me what each one did, so from a user&#039;s point of view it was a coin toss.

Personally, I think you will get more traffic and make more money with a full-text feed. Sorry, but I don&#039;t subscribe to partial feeds. I just don&#039;t have the time to go chasing down teasers. So you won&#039;t get linked as often from my site as you might if you had full-text feeds. And those links would drive more traffic to your site (not just to your RSS feed).

I&#039;ll explain this logic in more detail someday when I get a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you&#8217;re aware, Dwight, I wasn&#8217;t using any secret Jedi tricks. FeedDemon auto-discovered two feeds and gave me a choice when I clicked the orange RSS button. It didn&#8217;t tell me what each one did, so from a user&#8217;s point of view it was a coin toss.</p>
<p>Personally, I think you will get more traffic and make more money with a full-text feed. Sorry, but I don&#8217;t subscribe to partial feeds. I just don&#8217;t have the time to go chasing down teasers. So you won&#8217;t get linked as often from my site as you might if you had full-text feeds. And those links would drive more traffic to your site (not just to your RSS feed).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll explain this logic in more detail someday when I get a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=936&#038;cpage=1#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>TechBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=936#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;You want full-feed? You got it . . . for now&lt;/strong&gt;

As I&#039;ve written before, there&#039;s a running debate on the Web regarding the merits of full vs. partial RSS feeds. A full feed gets you the entire text of a post in your RSS reader; a partial feed delivers just...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You want full-feed? You got it . . . for now</strong></p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve written before, there&#8217;s a running debate on the Web regarding the merits of full vs. partial RSS feeds. A full feed gets you the entire text of a post in your RSS reader; a partial feed delivers just&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
