<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Windows Vista &#8230; hands down better than Windows XP&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=931</link>
	<description>Helping PC users make sense of Microsoft software since 1991</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=931&#038;cpage=1#comment-2325</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=931#comment-2325</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the expectation for Vista to be better than XP? If the OS was like XP, why bother? right? If the OS was worst than XP, why bother?

Wasn&#039;t Windows 98 better than 95? Isn&#039;t the latest OS for the mac better than the previous.

I just think that the expectation is better than the previous; otherwise, we end up with Windows ME.

Chuck

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the expectation for Vista to be better than XP? If the OS was like XP, why bother? right? If the OS was worst than XP, why bother?</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t Windows 98 better than 95? Isn&#8217;t the latest OS for the mac better than the previous.</p>
<p>I just think that the expectation is better than the previous; otherwise, we end up with Windows ME.</p>
<p>Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
