<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s in a name?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=930</link>
	<description>Helping PC users make sense of Microsoft software since 1991</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SAMUEL</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-155128</link>
		<dc:creator>SAMUEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 23:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=930#comment-155128</guid>
		<description>http://health86.narod.ru/index.html  health insurance 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://health86.narod.ru/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;health insurance &lt;/a&gt;
[url=http://health86.narod.ru]health insurance  [/url]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://health86.narod.ru/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://health86.narod.ru/index.html</a>  health insurance<br />
<a href="http://health86.narod.ru/" rel="nofollow">health insurance </a><br />
[url=http://health86.narod.ru]health insurance  [/url]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des Paroz</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>Des Paroz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=930#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed, perhaps VCR is a good analogy.  Although this is the official acronym used, most people I know just talk about video, which is the generic that covers all forms.  Hell, I talk about video when I refer to my TV harddisk recorder or DVD, sometimes.

Feeds is more generic than RSS, and more user friendly.  Dave also wonders why others have to reinvent - extending the RSS standard, Atom, etc.  Its because once visionaries like Dave create something, others can come along and see ways to extend.

Try explaining RSS to someone, and their eyes glaze over.  Try explaining web feeds, and they often get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed, perhaps VCR is a good analogy.  Although this is the official acronym used, most people I know just talk about video, which is the generic that covers all forms.  Hell, I talk about video when I refer to my TV harddisk recorder or DVD, sometimes.</p>
<p>Feeds is more generic than RSS, and more user friendly.  Dave also wonders why others have to reinvent &#8211; extending the RSS standard, Atom, etc.  Its because once visionaries like Dave create something, others can come along and see ways to extend.</p>
<p>Try explaining RSS to someone, and their eyes glaze over.  Try explaining web feeds, and they often get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael M. Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael M. Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=930#comment-2318</guid>
		<description>Although I agree he sounds like a &quot;whiner&quot;, he is also most likely a victim of the open-source/zero-IP brainwashing movement. Anyone who spends the thousands of hours required to create even a modest program - good, bad, or indifferent - deserves to have at least the hope of financial reward. Vanity, glory, peer recognition, or an ego trip are just not enough! If you&#039;ve created something new and worthwhile, you should be rewarded with some green stuff from the big bad software capitalists, like Microsoft, who figured out a long time ago how to turn other people&#039;s ideas into money. (Where did this absurdist notion come from: that you should give everything you&#039;re passionate about and have a talent for away for nothing? Would you apply this principle to any other part of your life!) That&#039;s why I think that the knee-jerk anti-patenters miss the point entirely. A software patent is effectively nothing more sinister than a copyright for software - and, BTW, usually requires full disclosure of the source code. It provides a modicum of protection that every software creator should consider - certainly a provisional patent, which anyone can file themselves for less than 100 bucks. An independent inventor who takes the minimum steps to protect his/her IP is not stiffling the intellectual march of mankind:) Only in the most extreme circumstances is it enforceable anyway - as it costs $2M to $3M plus to launch a patent infringement case. (IP law firms will not even consider an infringement case unless it can return $5M to $10M plus.)

p.s. RSS was such a lousy name - it certainly turned me off from the get go. Contrast with BitTorrent - a great name, a great idea, and, behind it, another poor inventor asking for donations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree he sounds like a &#8220;whiner&#8221;, he is also most likely a victim of the open-source/zero-IP brainwashing movement. Anyone who spends the thousands of hours required to create even a modest program &#8211; good, bad, or indifferent &#8211; deserves to have at least the hope of financial reward. Vanity, glory, peer recognition, or an ego trip are just not enough! If you&#8217;ve created something new and worthwhile, you should be rewarded with some green stuff from the big bad software capitalists, like Microsoft, who figured out a long time ago how to turn other people&#8217;s ideas into money. (Where did this absurdist notion come from: that you should give everything you&#8217;re passionate about and have a talent for away for nothing? Would you apply this principle to any other part of your life!) That&#8217;s why I think that the knee-jerk anti-patenters miss the point entirely. A software patent is effectively nothing more sinister than a copyright for software &#8211; and, BTW, usually requires full disclosure of the source code. It provides a modicum of protection that every software creator should consider &#8211; certainly a provisional patent, which anyone can file themselves for less than 100 bucks. An independent inventor who takes the minimum steps to protect his/her IP is not stiffling the intellectual march of mankind:) Only in the most extreme circumstances is it enforceable anyway &#8211; as it costs $2M to $3M plus to launch a patent infringement case. (IP law firms will not even consider an infringement case unless it can return $5M to $10M plus.)</p>
<p>p.s. RSS was such a lousy name &#8211; it certainly turned me off from the get go. Contrast with BitTorrent &#8211; a great name, a great idea, and, behind it, another poor inventor asking for donations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guest</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-2319</link>
		<dc:creator>guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=930#comment-2319</guid>
		<description>Maybe the reason he cares is because he has invested in domain names that contain the string &#039;RSS&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the reason he cares is because he has invested in domain names that contain the string &#8216;RSS&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is there a PC Doctor in the house?</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-2320</link>
		<dc:creator>Is there a PC Doctor in the house?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=930#comment-2320</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ed Bott - &#8220;What&#8217;s in a name?&#8221;&lt;/strong&gt;

Ed Bott&#160; just posted something interesting that I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about in the past few days.
	RSS
	The post starts off because of a post made by Dave Winer (I&#8217;ll let you go there to read it for yourself if you want the backgro...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ed Bott &#8211; &#8220;What&#8217;s in a name?&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Ed Bott&nbsp; just posted something interesting that I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about in the past few days.<br />
	RSS<br />
	The post starts off because of a post made by Dave Winer (I&#8217;ll let you go there to read it for yourself if you want the backgro&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Read/Write Web</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-2321</link>
		<dc:creator>Read/Write Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=930#comment-2321</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Feeds are the new RSS&lt;/strong&gt;

This week I kicked off a discussion about what the brand name of RSS should be, going forward. It&#039;s generated a lot of great discussion, including some excellent comments on my blog. And funnily enough, I&#039;m now convinced that in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Feeds are the new RSS</strong></p>
<p>This week I kicked off a discussion about what the brand name of RSS should be, going forward. It&#8217;s generated a lot of great discussion, including some excellent comments on my blog. And funnily enough, I&#8217;m now convinced that in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mediaburn Radio Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mediaburn Radio Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=930#comment-2322</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&#039;That Which We Call A Rose, By Any Other Name...&lt;/strong&gt;

...would smell as sweet.&quot; - Billy Shakespeare With RSS, it&#039;s the function and the format that&#039;s important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8216;That Which We Call A Rose, By Any Other Name&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;would smell as sweet.&#8221; &#8211; Billy Shakespeare With RSS, it&#8217;s the function and the format that&#8217;s important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Barnett blog</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-2323</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Barnett blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=930#comment-2323</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;If you love RSS...&lt;/strong&gt;

So about all this
RSS vs. Feeds 
naming brouhaha, what can I say?


I love RSS.&#160;  I&#039;ve been...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>If you love RSS&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>So about all this<br />
RSS vs. Feeds<br />
naming brouhaha, what can I say?</p>
<p>I love RSS.&nbsp;  I&#8217;ve been&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MasterMaq's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=930&#038;cpage=1#comment-2324</link>
		<dc:creator>MasterMaq's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=930#comment-2324</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Web Feeds or RSS?&lt;/strong&gt;

Lots of discussion going on lately about whether or not Microsoft, and everyone else for that matter,...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Web Feeds or RSS?</strong></p>
<p>Lots of discussion going on lately about whether or not Microsoft, and everyone else for that matter,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
