<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WaPo&#8217;s new security blog finds a Firefox flaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=603</link>
	<description>Helping PC users make sense of Microsoft software since 1991</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris G.</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=603&#038;cpage=1#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=603#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>If I had to guess, seeing how it was a HTML e-mail, could it be that there was a graphic (like a GIF or JPEG) screenshot of a real e-mail embedded into the e-mail itself with a link set to the entire picture. If done &quot;right&quot;, in theory no one could notice the difference unless they have images or HTML turned off. Thus, when you click on the content in the e-mail, since it is one giant picture, it could just launch the link (which is exactly how every e-mail client is designed btw).

The only way around it would be to attempt to highlight the text to see if it was really text or a picture.

Anyways, that is my guess as to what happened. I have no clue how you could design any e-mail client to block a scam like that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to guess, seeing how it was a HTML e-mail, could it be that there was a graphic (like a GIF or JPEG) screenshot of a real e-mail embedded into the e-mail itself with a link set to the entire picture. If done &#8220;right&#8221;, in theory no one could notice the difference unless they have images or HTML turned off. Thus, when you click on the content in the e-mail, since it is one giant picture, it could just launch the link (which is exactly how every e-mail client is designed btw).</p>
<p>The only way around it would be to attempt to highlight the text to see if it was really text or a picture.</p>
<p>Anyways, that is my guess as to what happened. I have no clue how you could design any e-mail client to block a scam like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
