<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox is not a security cure-all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=337</link>
	<description>Helping PC users make sense of Microsoft software since 1991</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil T.</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=337&#038;cpage=1#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=337#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Firefox does have an automatic update notifier function, which is turned on by default. I also seem to remember that when running Firefox 1.0PR and a critical patch was released for it, it interrupted the user&#039;s browsing session and encouraged them to update.

It&#039;s also likely that Firefox will be updated with new versions more often than IE, so the patches will come with new releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox does have an automatic update notifier function, which is turned on by default. I also seem to remember that when running Firefox 1.0PR and a critical patch was released for it, it interrupted the user&#8217;s browsing session and encouraged them to update.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also likely that Firefox will be updated with new versions more often than IE, so the patches will come with new releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=337&#038;cpage=1#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=337#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Right, Firefox is configured to check for updates automatically. So has every version of Windows for several years, as do antivirus programs, and yet people IGNORE the message to update their software. I assume that a nontrivial percentage of Firefox users will ignore the inevitable update messages as well.

We&#039;re talking about the masses here, not about techies like you and me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, Firefox is configured to check for updates automatically. So has every version of Windows for several years, as do antivirus programs, and yet people IGNORE the message to update their software. I assume that a nontrivial percentage of Firefox users will ignore the inevitable update messages as well.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re talking about the masses here, not about techies like you and me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hellsbellboy</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=337&#038;cpage=1#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Hellsbellboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=337#comment-571</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Windows Autoupdate is automatic, or at least it&#039;s pretty easy to turn off, and it&#039;s definitely off on the Corporate level, at a huge Corporation I work at in St Paul MN, Windows Update isn&#039;t even a option, you have to go type in the URL or do a websearch to find Windows Updates, as it&#039;s not turned on and theirs no little Windows Update button on the Start menu.
Then again Corporations are using Firefox either.  Saddly what they are doing more and more is locking down systems from having Internet access in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Windows Autoupdate is automatic, or at least it&#8217;s pretty easy to turn off, and it&#8217;s definitely off on the Corporate level, at a huge Corporation I work at in St Paul MN, Windows Update isn&#8217;t even a option, you have to go type in the URL or do a websearch to find Windows Updates, as it&#8217;s not turned on and theirs no little Windows Update button on the Start menu.<br />
Then again Corporations are using Firefox either.  Saddly what they are doing more and more is locking down systems from having Internet access in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan C</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=337&#038;cpage=1#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=337#comment-572</guid>
		<description>From my experience Firefox has proven itself to be ten million time better that IE. One simple reason is Pop-ups it can easily block pop-ups, Second reason is I found it faster on all my computers even my slow laptop. Third its easily customizable w/ Themes and nice extensions to download wich by the way IE does not have, Fourth there are so many tweaks for firefox that actually work and help performance of the browser. Fifth reason is it is more friendly to hackers/programmers per se. So really the more popular it gets the more hackers are going to love it because of all the stuff you can do with it like changing your useragent and alot more tweaks. So I would have to say your wrong on the fact about the more popular it gets the more flames or whatever they are going to get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experience Firefox has proven itself to be ten million time better that IE. One simple reason is Pop-ups it can easily block pop-ups, Second reason is I found it faster on all my computers even my slow laptop. Third its easily customizable w/ Themes and nice extensions to download wich by the way IE does not have, Fourth there are so many tweaks for firefox that actually work and help performance of the browser. Fifth reason is it is more friendly to hackers/programmers per se. So really the more popular it gets the more hackers are going to love it because of all the stuff you can do with it like changing your useragent and alot more tweaks. So I would have to say your wrong on the fact about the more popular it gets the more flames or whatever they are going to get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=337&#038;cpage=1#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=337#comment-573</guid>
		<description>&quot;Windows users who conscientiously apply patches and security updates (a painless process using Automatic Updates) don&#039;t get hit. Those who ignore updates become victims.&quot;

I think that is partly true, but I wonder if completely.  Spyware seems to still find it&#039;s way on updated computers.  And not just tracking cookies or from knowingly installing adware.  IE still seems to be the main conduit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Windows users who conscientiously apply patches and security updates (a painless process using Automatic Updates) don&#8217;t get hit. Those who ignore updates become victims.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think that is partly true, but I wonder if completely.  Spyware seems to still find it&#8217;s way on updated computers.  And not just tracking cookies or from knowingly installing adware.  IE still seems to be the main conduit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=337&#038;cpage=1#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=337#comment-574</guid>
		<description>Spyware can still find its way onto a patched computer if a user clicks a link to install the software. IE makes it too easy to fool a naive or unsophisticated person into saying yes when they should say no. But anyone who chooses to install Kazaa or Grokster despite the many known problems with these programs invites the problem on their own as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spyware can still find its way onto a patched computer if a user clicks a link to install the software. IE makes it too easy to fool a naive or unsophisticated person into saying yes when they should say no. But anyone who chooses to install Kazaa or Grokster despite the many known problems with these programs invites the problem on their own as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=337&#038;cpage=1#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=337#comment-575</guid>
		<description>&quot;IE makes it too easy to fool a naive or unsophisticated person into saying yes when they should say no.&quot;

True.  But even if you&#039;re smart, what about drive by downloads, tricky dialog boxes, or it&#039;s late and you just click on the wrong thing?  Is it possible to make IE safe?

I&#039;d like to take a fully updated XP box, without admin priviledges and default security settings and browse IE through some bad web pages and see what it picks up.  Clicking &quot;No&quot; on any requested downloads.  Would that be a fair test?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;IE makes it too easy to fool a naive or unsophisticated person into saying yes when they should say no.&#8221;</p>
<p>True.  But even if you&#8217;re smart, what about drive by downloads, tricky dialog boxes, or it&#8217;s late and you just click on the wrong thing?  Is it possible to make IE safe?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to take a fully updated XP box, without admin priviledges and default security settings and browse IE through some bad web pages and see what it picks up.  Clicking &#8220;No&#8221; on any requested downloads.  Would that be a fair test?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YALD - Patrick Grote's Notes</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=337&#038;cpage=1#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>YALD - Patrick Grote's Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/wordpress/?p=337#comment-576</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Firefox Security ... Are you safe?&lt;/strong&gt;

Unless you&#039;ve been living in a computer room sealed off from the internet, you&#039;ll know that Firefox has become very popular lately. It&#039;s almost fashionable to espouse the browser for being anti-Microsoft. But is it safer than Internet Explorer?...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Firefox Security &#8230; Are you safe?</strong></p>
<p>Unless you&#8217;ve been living in a computer room sealed off from the internet, you&#8217;ll know that Firefox has become very popular lately. It&#8217;s almost fashionable to espouse the browser for being anti-Microsoft. But is it safer than Internet Explorer?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
