<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have you updated Windows Search yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047</link>
	<description>Helping PC users make sense of Microsoft software since 1991</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047&#038;cpage=1#comment-170611</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047#comment-170611</guid>
		<description>Reminder - Windows Search 4 coming to WU soon
 http://blogs.technet.com/mu/archive/2008/07/18/windows-search-4.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminder &#8211; Windows Search 4 coming to WU soon<br />
 <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/mu/archive/2008/07/18/windows-search-4.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.technet.com/mu/archive/2008/07/18/windows-search-4.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047&#038;cpage=1#comment-170133</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047#comment-170133</guid>
		<description>The updated search does work extremely well. I&#039;m quite impressed with the improvement especially in XP. Vista search is , and always has been great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The updated search does work extremely well. I&#8217;m quite impressed with the improvement especially in XP. Vista search is , and always has been great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047&#038;cpage=1#comment-170074</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047#comment-170074</guid>
		<description>George, no it doesn&#039;t. The Thunderbird developers would have to write a protocol handler to do that work. At one point there was a crude beta that did this, but it no longer works. Indexing support is supposedly on Thunderbird&#039;s roadmap but is not there yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, no it doesn&#8217;t. The Thunderbird developers would have to write a protocol handler to do that work. At one point there was a crude beta that did this, but it no longer works. Indexing support is supposedly on Thunderbird&#8217;s roadmap but is not there yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047&#038;cpage=1#comment-170073</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047#comment-170073</guid>
		<description>Does Windows Search 4  index Thunderbird emails?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Windows Search 4  index Thunderbird emails?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047&#038;cpage=1#comment-169880</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 02:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047#comment-169880</guid>
		<description>@mike

Thanks Mike - worked like a charm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike</p>
<p>Thanks Mike &#8211; worked like a charm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047&#038;cpage=1#comment-169879</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047#comment-169879</guid>
		<description>Does this version actually highlight the searched terms when displaying the results?

For example, if searching for &#039;dog&#039; in a massive text file you were presented with a bunch of text but the actual text you were searching for was not highlighted!
A critical oversight for my needs which meant I uninstalled it and went back to Agent Ransack. (Actually Google desktop search also highlights results)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this version actually highlight the searched terms when displaying the results?</p>
<p>For example, if searching for &#8216;dog&#8217; in a massive text file you were presented with a bunch of text but the actual text you were searching for was not highlighted!<br />
A critical oversight for my needs which meant I uninstalled it and went back to Agent Ransack. (Actually Google desktop search also highlights results)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047&#038;cpage=1#comment-169878</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047#comment-169878</guid>
		<description>@Bill

I had no problem with it, but I am running PP1 beta though. 

I remote desktop&#039;d in. Downloaded the package. Ran it and rebooted. Just right click and copy the link Ed put above and paste in to IE on the WHS desktop. You probably just got a corrupt download for whatever reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bill</p>
<p>I had no problem with it, but I am running PP1 beta though. </p>
<p>I remote desktop&#8217;d in. Downloaded the package. Ran it and rebooted. Just right click and copy the link Ed put above and paste in to IE on the WHS desktop. You probably just got a corrupt download for whatever reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047&#038;cpage=1#comment-169872</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047#comment-169872</guid>
		<description>Having trouble with the version for Windows Home Server. After downloading it and saving it to the software folder on the server, I log on to the server using the remote connection. I then double-click on the installation file, but it will not install, but gives me an error that it cannot recognize the device. Anyone else having this problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having trouble with the version for Windows Home Server. After downloading it and saving it to the software folder on the server, I log on to the server using the remote connection. I then double-click on the installation file, but it will not install, but gives me an error that it cannot recognize the device. Anyone else having this problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047&#038;cpage=1#comment-169868</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2047#comment-169868</guid>
		<description>Is this update available thru Windows Update for Vista x32?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this update available thru Windows Update for Vista x32?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
