<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista for $79? Uh, no.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567</link>
	<description>Helping PC users make sense of Microsoft software since 1991</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: evilkat</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153996</link>
		<dc:creator>evilkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153996</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m confused here then...but when you click on the &#039;video&#039; checkbox, doesn&#039;t it look for videos in ALL folders on the computer? 

Also what if you want to backup a file type not listed in the categories? Can you define a custom category then? Can file types be associated with a category?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m confused here then&#8230;but when you click on the &#8216;video&#8217; checkbox, doesn&#8217;t it look for videos in ALL folders on the computer? </p>
<p>Also what if you want to backup a file type not listed in the categories? Can you define a custom category then? Can file types be associated with a category?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153991</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153991</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; I don’t want to think about making copies of a folder. I want my OS to do that FOR me. I thought THAT was the whole point of a backup program?

But it DOES do that. And it does it well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>> I don’t want to think about making copies of a folder. I want my OS to do that FOR me. I thought THAT was the whole point of a backup program?</p>
<p>But it DOES do that. And it does it well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilkat</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153989</link>
		<dc:creator>evilkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153989</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to think about making copies of a folder. I want my OS to do that FOR me. I thought THAT was the whole point of a backup program?

Once again, while the idea is great for the masses, it falls short for people who know their computers well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to think about making copies of a folder. I want my OS to do that FOR me. I thought THAT was the whole point of a backup program?</p>
<p>Once again, while the idea is great for the masses, it falls short for people who know their computers well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153983</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153983</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t need a backup program to copy a folder full of music or video files. You just copy them. Backup is to get your data backed up.

I fully concede this is not a full-featured all-bells-and-whistles backup solution. It&#039;s not intended to be one. I would heartily recommend it for my friends and family who don&#039;t do backups because they&#039;re too complicated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need a backup program to copy a folder full of music or video files. You just copy them. Backup is to get your data backed up.</p>
<p>I fully concede this is not a full-featured all-bells-and-whistles backup solution. It&#8217;s not intended to be one. I would heartily recommend it for my friends and family who don&#8217;t do backups because they&#8217;re too complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilkat</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153980</link>
		<dc:creator>evilkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153980</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ed. Well that&#039;s great for Poguesque people, but if there are only certain videos/documents we want backed up so that we don&#039;t have to waste gobs of DVDs/storage media, it sucks to be us. Not that DVDs are expensive, it&#039;s just the principle of the matter. While I can understand the reasoning of the Vista team, if a user only wants to back-up certain folders, then they should be allowed to do so. 

If for example a user already HAS a backup of his media prior to installing Vista, then there&#039;s no need to back the whole damn media library all over again. Of course once Vista is installed, I&#039;m sure it&#039;s smart enough to make incremental backups...but still, it would have been nice to have the option of selecting which folders to back up. Perhaps there&#039;s a command line version that allows this? Typically, the rule of thumb is, if the GUI is ugly, unintuitive and looks daunting, it typically has more functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ed. Well that&#8217;s great for Poguesque people, but if there are only certain videos/documents we want backed up so that we don&#8217;t have to waste gobs of DVDs/storage media, it sucks to be us. Not that DVDs are expensive, it&#8217;s just the principle of the matter. While I can understand the reasoning of the Vista team, if a user only wants to back-up certain folders, then they should be allowed to do so. </p>
<p>If for example a user already HAS a backup of his media prior to installing Vista, then there&#8217;s no need to back the whole damn media library all over again. Of course once Vista is installed, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s smart enough to make incremental backups&#8230;but still, it would have been nice to have the option of selecting which folders to back up. Perhaps there&#8217;s a command line version that allows this? Typically, the rule of thumb is, if the GUI is ugly, unintuitive and looks daunting, it typically has more functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153979</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153979</guid>
		<description>Evilkat, see my article at ZDNet for answer to the first question.

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=175</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evilkat, see my article at ZDNet for answer to the first question.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=175" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=175</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153977</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153977</guid>
		<description>For the record, I got my &quot;Vista for $79!&quot; e-mail today.  I was disappointed that it actually took this long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I got my &#8220;Vista for $79!&#8221; e-mail today.  I was disappointed that it actually took this long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilkat</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153973</link>
		<dc:creator>evilkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153973</guid>
		<description>I have a question for you Ed. First check out this article for reference:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/14/technology/14pogue.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;oref=slogin

However, the key passage is this:

&quot;Windows finally comes with a prominent backup program. That’s great, except that you can specify only which categories of things to back up (pictures, e-mail, and so on), not which specific files or folders.

And then there’s that Sidebar, the floating layer of mini-programs. If you close one of the gadgets, you lose its contents forever: your notes in the Post-it Notes gadget, your stock portfolio in the Stocks gadget, and so on. You couldn’t save them if you wanted to. How could Microsoft have missed that one.&quot;


Are both of these points true? I would have emailed ya these questions, but I couldn&#039;t find your email on the page and I know this is slightly off-topic..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question for you Ed. First check out this article for reference:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/14/technology/14pogue.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/14/technology/14pogue.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;oref=slogin</a></p>
<p>However, the key passage is this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Windows finally comes with a prominent backup program. That’s great, except that you can specify only which categories of things to back up (pictures, e-mail, and so on), not which specific files or folders.</p>
<p>And then there’s that Sidebar, the floating layer of mini-programs. If you close one of the gadgets, you lose its contents forever: your notes in the Post-it Notes gadget, your stock portfolio in the Stocks gadget, and so on. You couldn’t save them if you wanted to. How could Microsoft have missed that one.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are both of these points true? I would have emailed ya these questions, but I couldn&#8217;t find your email on the page and I know this is slightly off-topic..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153970</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153970</guid>
		<description>What you can do is get a copy of XP Home or Pro from any reputable online seller like NewEgg that come with &quot;coupons&quot; for Vista.  The price is usually reasonable $80-$409 depending on the version of XP.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.asp?DEPA=0&amp;type=&amp;Description=XP+Vista+Coupon&amp;Submit=ENE&amp;N=0&amp;Ntk=all&amp;Go.x=0&amp;Go.y=0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you can do is get a copy of XP Home or Pro from any reputable online seller like NewEgg that come with &#8220;coupons&#8221; for Vista.  The price is usually reasonable $80-$409 depending on the version of XP.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.asp?DEPA=0&amp;type=&amp;Description=XP+Vista+Coupon&amp;Submit=ENE&amp;N=0&amp;Ntk=all&amp;Go.x=0&amp;Go.y=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.asp?DEPA=0&amp;type=&amp;Description=XP+Vista+Coupon&amp;Submit=ENE&amp;N=0&amp;Ntk=all&amp;Go.x=0&amp;Go.y=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153966</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153966</guid>
		<description>My old boss, a Senior VP of IS making a gazillion dollars a year, almost bought Photoshop through a spam e-mail, because he thought the $55.95 deal was real. Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My old boss, a Senior VP of IS making a gazillion dollars a year, almost bought Photoshop through a spam e-mail, because he thought the $55.95 deal was real. Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153963</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153963</guid>
		<description>you usually get what you pay for.i wonder if you pay what is downloaded to the dvd.&quot;marry had a little lamb&quot;?shame on you edd for running a free windows vista offer in you advertise area.you know what this is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you usually get what you pay for.i wonder if you pay what is downloaded to the dvd.&#8221;marry had a little lamb&#8221;?shame on you edd for running a free windows vista offer in you advertise area.you know what this is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herbert N Swearengen III</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153962</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert N Swearengen III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 07:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153962</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been getting that spam too!

I forwarded the first one to the Microsoft anti-piracy email address. But then I got several more. Then I see Ed Bott&#039;s blog with the exact same web site.

Although anyone who falls for this is a fool, you have to admit that the website looks professional--except for the ridiculous prices...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been getting that spam too!</p>
<p>I forwarded the first one to the Microsoft anti-piracy email address. But then I got several more. Then I see Ed Bott&#8217;s blog with the exact same web site.</p>
<p>Although anyone who falls for this is a fool, you have to admit that the website looks professional&#8211;except for the ridiculous prices&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orcmid</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153959</link>
		<dc:creator>orcmid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153959</guid>
		<description>Wow, Vista Ultimate!  I&#039;m still not going to be opening up any of these.  
http://orcmid.com/blog/2006/12/79-price-war-at-spam-i-am.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Vista Ultimate!  I&#8217;m still not going to be opening up any of these.<br />
<a href="http://orcmid.com/blog/2006/12/79-price-war-at-spam-i-am.asp" rel="nofollow">http://orcmid.com/blog/2006/12/79-price-war-at-spam-i-am.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sloop John B</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153958</link>
		<dc:creator>Sloop John B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153958</guid>
		<description>And that &quot;little something extra&quot; will probably end up costing those who buy this junk more than they save.

I get several of these a day today too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that &#8220;little something extra&#8221; will probably end up costing those who buy this junk more than they save.</p>
<p>I get several of these a day today too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serdar</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567&#038;cpage=1#comment-153956</link>
		<dc:creator>Serdar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 16:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1567#comment-153956</guid>
		<description>I remember reading about a survey where they profiled the people who fell for scams like these. Most of them had gross incomes of over $200,000 a year and evidently had plenty of money to blow on such things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading about a survey where they profiled the people who fell for scams like these. Most of them had gross incomes of over $200,000 a year and evidently had plenty of money to blow on such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
