<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ed Bott&#039;s Windows Expertise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog</link>
	<description>Helping PC users make sense of Microsoft software since 1991</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Office 2010 Beta now available by Bill Wardino</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2695&#038;cpage=1#comment-180728</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wardino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2695#comment-180728</guid>
		<description>I especially like the steel look and lack of vibrant colors, which in my view was a distraction and gauche.
  I am using Outlook for the first time in several years.  
  I am impressed, so far.  
  I haven&#039;t had any trouble navigating; it appears that all things are where it makes sense for them to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I especially like the steel look and lack of vibrant colors, which in my view was a distraction and gauche.<br />
  I am using Outlook for the first time in several years.<br />
  I am impressed, so far.<br />
  I haven&#8217;t had any trouble navigating; it appears that all things are where it makes sense for them to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s the extra driver info on Windows Update? by Vincent Clement</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2698&#038;cpage=1#comment-180724</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2698#comment-180724</guid>
		<description>This is how it works in Vista. The link takes you the generic page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is how it works in Vista. The link takes you the generic page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Office 2010 Beta now available by Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2695&#038;cpage=1#comment-180723</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2695#comment-180723</guid>
		<description>I personally liked the globe idea in 2007.  The &quot;File&quot; idea is a little too much, as it looks bad and works funky to me.

For now though, I&#039;m going to have to un-install it and re-install 2007.  I work for a small business, and we have a mix of technologies that require a number of plug-ins for Office.  None of those plug-ins worked in 2010.  I&#039;m sure if we were 100% Microsoft in all aspects, we&#039;d have less trouble.  But due to the industry software requirements we must follow, that just can&#039;t happen.  Too bad Microsoft continues to be very proprietary in far too many areas.  Seriously, if a plug-in works in Outlook, it should work in all versions of Outlook.  If we are moving foward, are we really going foward if this occurs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally liked the globe idea in 2007.  The &#8220;File&#8221; idea is a little too much, as it looks bad and works funky to me.</p>
<p>For now though, I&#8217;m going to have to un-install it and re-install 2007.  I work for a small business, and we have a mix of technologies that require a number of plug-ins for Office.  None of those plug-ins worked in 2010.  I&#8217;m sure if we were 100% Microsoft in all aspects, we&#8217;d have less trouble.  But due to the industry software requirements we must follow, that just can&#8217;t happen.  Too bad Microsoft continues to be very proprietary in far too many areas.  Seriously, if a plug-in works in Outlook, it should work in all versions of Outlook.  If we are moving foward, are we really going foward if this occurs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Office 2010 Beta now available by Betsy</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2695&#038;cpage=1#comment-180722</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2695#comment-180722</guid>
		<description>I had to uninstall Office 2007 32-bit in order to try the 65-bit version of 2010.  I was relieved to find that my Groove workspaces were recognized immediately.  I would like MS to swat one bug - I couldn&#039;t turn off the prompt for permanently deleting items in Outlook.  I checked the forums, and others have this problem as well.  I wound up using autoarchiving on the Deleted Items folder to work around the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to uninstall Office 2007 32-bit in order to try the 65-bit version of 2010.  I was relieved to find that my Groove workspaces were recognized immediately.  I would like MS to swat one bug &#8211; I couldn&#8217;t turn off the prompt for permanently deleting items in Outlook.  I checked the forums, and others have this problem as well.  I wound up using autoarchiving on the Deleted Items folder to work around the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Office 2010 Beta now available by mgo</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2695&#038;cpage=1#comment-180721</link>
		<dc:creator>mgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2695#comment-180721</guid>
		<description>Generally, a success.  I tried the &quot;Custom&quot; install (separate installation with Office 2007 intact, or so I thought), but got a whackadoodle error message.  2nd try was &quot;Update&quot; install option, and that one went well.

Looks like most of my settings are intact.

Had the usual, &quot;now, where the hell did they put this option?&quot; but eventually found my way around OK.

OneNote is still there...and as you said years ago, Ed, it&#039;s a killer app!

I&#039;ll rate Office 2010 a strong Pretty Good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, a success.  I tried the &#8220;Custom&#8221; install (separate installation with Office 2007 intact, or so I thought), but got a whackadoodle error message.  2nd try was &#8220;Update&#8221; install option, and that one went well.</p>
<p>Looks like most of my settings are intact.</p>
<p>Had the usual, &#8220;now, where the hell did they put this option?&#8221; but eventually found my way around OK.</p>
<p>OneNote is still there&#8230;and as you said years ago, Ed, it&#8217;s a killer app!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll rate Office 2010 a strong Pretty Good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Office 2010 Beta now available by Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2695&#038;cpage=1#comment-180719</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2695#comment-180719</guid>
		<description>It looks like they changed the logo button at the top left to a &quot;File&quot; button in this beta.  I&#039;m REALLY glad they did that, as sticking two buttons with similar logos right next to one another would create no end of confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like they changed the logo button at the top left to a &#8220;File&#8221; button in this beta.  I&#8217;m REALLY glad they did that, as sticking two buttons with similar logos right next to one another would create no end of confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 information for IT pros by Raymond</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2689&#038;cpage=1#comment-180713</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2689#comment-180713</guid>
		<description>ED: If it helps an IT Pro, Microsoft has a free Windows 7 Enterprise edition 90 day trial that is downloadable.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/cc442495.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ED: If it helps an IT Pro, Microsoft has a free Windows 7 Enterprise edition 90 day trial that is downloadable.<br />
<a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/cc442495.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/cc442495.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New CableCARD tools loosen the grip of DRM by Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2688&#038;cpage=1#comment-180712</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2688#comment-180712</guid>
		<description>Les, according to my bill I am being charged $1.50 per month for two CableCards. It appears on my bill as a TiVo2 card, ironically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Les, according to my bill I am being charged $1.50 per month for two CableCards. It appears on my bill as a TiVo2 card, ironically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New CableCARD tools loosen the grip of DRM by Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2688&#038;cpage=1#comment-180711</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2688#comment-180711</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;ve done several in-place upgrades and old programs continue to play back. You are correct that old programs recorded on your CableCARD tuner will not play back if you do a clean install.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve done several in-place upgrades and old programs continue to play back. You are correct that old programs recorded on your CableCARD tuner will not play back if you do a clean install.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New CableCARD tools loosen the grip of DRM by Kirk</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2688&#038;cpage=1#comment-180710</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2688#comment-180710</guid>
		<description>Hi:

I have a Dell XPS 420 system with an ATI Digital Tuner. I have a lot of recorded programs. Does anyone have a clue whether these programs will still work if I upgrade to Windows 7? (not a clean install; I&#039;m pretty sure that wouldn&#039;t work...just an upgrade)...any help appreciated; Kirk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi:</p>
<p>I have a Dell XPS 420 system with an ATI Digital Tuner. I have a lot of recorded programs. Does anyone have a clue whether these programs will still work if I upgrade to Windows 7? (not a clean install; I&#8217;m pretty sure that wouldn&#8217;t work&#8230;just an upgrade)&#8230;any help appreciated; Kirk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is your old program or device compatible with Windows 7? by Peter Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2663&#038;cpage=1#comment-180709</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2663#comment-180709</guid>
		<description>I have always been a strong supporter of Canon and it&#039;s printer products until I tried to get a 64 bit driver for my two year old LBP 3000 laser printer. According to Canon they have no plans to produce a 64 bit driver for this otherwise great little laser printer. Does anyone have a solution that will work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been a strong supporter of Canon and it&#8217;s printer products until I tried to get a 64 bit driver for my two year old LBP 3000 laser printer. According to Canon they have no plans to produce a 64 bit driver for this otherwise great little laser printer. Does anyone have a solution that will work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New CableCARD tools loosen the grip of DRM by Les Bowman</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2688&#038;cpage=1#comment-180708</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2688#comment-180708</guid>
		<description>Not to get too personal but what does your cable company charge you for the cablecard tuners? Here in the PacNW I have wave cable and pay 50$/month for just extended basic. I am assuming you pay the base rate for your cable tier and then an &#039;add-on&#039; price for each tuner, is this so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to get too personal but what does your cable company charge you for the cablecard tuners? Here in the PacNW I have wave cable and pay 50$/month for just extended basic. I am assuming you pay the base rate for your cable tier and then an &#8216;add-on&#8217; price for each tuner, is this so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Daylight Saving Time by Umair</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2673&#038;cpage=1#comment-180705</link>
		<dc:creator>Umair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2673#comment-180705</guid>
		<description>DST has troubled me a lot. I am in Pakistan and DST is observed rather irregularly and it takes Microsoft months to issue an update for it. I once downloaded a utility from Microsoft  that allowed adding a custom time zone. It did add one to the list but whenever I tried to select it, it would give me an error that &quot;an error has occurred&quot; and &quot;the changes could not be saved&quot;. I suppose it was for Vista and XP and didn&#039;t work on Seven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DST has troubled me a lot. I am in Pakistan and DST is observed rather irregularly and it takes Microsoft months to issue an update for it. I once downloaded a utility from Microsoft  that allowed adding a custom time zone. It did add one to the list but whenever I tried to select it, it would give me an error that &#8220;an error has occurred&#8221; and &#8220;the changes could not be saved&#8221;. I suppose it was for Vista and XP and didn&#8217;t work on Seven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is your old program or device compatible with Windows 7? by lgude</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2663&#038;cpage=1#comment-180704</link>
		<dc:creator>lgude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2663#comment-180704</guid>
		<description>dmccall&#039;s tip about using the S300 (portable version of the S510 scanner) is what I&#039;ve found too. I ran both the 32 bit and 64 bit Win 7 Beta and RC and found the 32 bit version would run most things while the 64 bit was fussier. So I&#039;m upgrading to 32 bit win 7 on my notebook (HP tx1000 with 2 gigs) and 64 bit on my core 2 duo desktop with  8 gigs. If you have only 1 computer or something just wont run on Win 7 32 bit than XP mode sounds the way to go for older hardware. XP mode is only available on Win 7 professional or above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dmccall&#8217;s tip about using the S300 (portable version of the S510 scanner) is what I&#8217;ve found too. I ran both the 32 bit and 64 bit Win 7 Beta and RC and found the 32 bit version would run most things while the 64 bit was fussier. So I&#8217;m upgrading to 32 bit win 7 on my notebook (HP tx1000 with 2 gigs) and 64 bit on my core 2 duo desktop with  8 gigs. If you have only 1 computer or something just wont run on Win 7 32 bit than XP mode sounds the way to go for older hardware. XP mode is only available on Win 7 professional or above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Got any Windows 7 questions for HP? by Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2674&#038;cpage=1#comment-180703</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2674#comment-180703</guid>
		<description>Mitchell, and Richard, be sure to go there and ask those questions yourself. I&#039;m not a participant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitchell, and Richard, be sure to go there and ask those questions yourself. I&#8217;m not a participant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
