<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows performance tweaking myths, busted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2008/08/windows-performance-tweaking-myths-busted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2008/08/windows-performance-tweaking-myths-busted/</link>
	<description>I write stuff. Mostly about Windows. Sometimes I get paid for it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirn</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2008/08/windows-performance-tweaking-myths-busted/comment-page-1/#comment-174074</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2096#comment-174074</guid>
		<description>Generally, I agree with the debunking here, but for two points:
Registry cleaning and disabling certain services may not yield a performance gain. But that *doesn&#039;t* mean there aren&#039;t reasons you&#039;d do both those things.
Registry cleaning or registry modification can be helpful when troubleshooting a problem. Now, generally, this winds up making a specific change rather than relying on a catch-all app, but even the catch-all apps can prevent problems from occurring.
Specific service disabling CAN be used for performance gains and/or troubleshooting. The difference is, you&#039;re disabling something you know is a performance drag or compatibility problem, not just arbitrarily disabling services.
In both these cases, I know these things can matter for doing real-time audio and music performance. But I agree with the article that it&#039;s not sort of randomly applying these techniques and hoping for the best; that&#039;s almost certain not to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally, I agree with the debunking here, but for two points:</p>
<p>Registry cleaning and disabling certain services may not yield a performance gain. But that *doesn&#8217;t* mean there aren&#8217;t reasons you&#8217;d do both those things.</p>
<p>Registry cleaning or registry modification can be helpful when troubleshooting a problem. Now, generally, this winds up making a specific change rather than relying on a catch-all app, but even the catch-all apps can prevent problems from occurring. </p>
<p>Specific service disabling CAN be used for performance gains and/or troubleshooting. The difference is, you&#8217;re disabling something you know is a performance drag or compatibility problem, not just arbitrarily disabling services.</p>
<p>In both these cases, I know these things can matter for doing real-time audio and music performance. But I agree with the article that it&#8217;s not sort of randomly applying these techniques and hoping for the best; that&#8217;s almost certain not to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2008/08/windows-performance-tweaking-myths-busted/comment-page-1/#comment-173689</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2096#comment-173689</guid>
		<description>I echo the commentator who said &quot;throwing my hat in with the disabling service = improved performance&quot;, but only when you&#039;re careful about what you are doing.
I recently re-installed XP Home on one of my computers. I also installed a large HOSTS file as a prophylactic measure.
After that, my first web page access (after booting) would take half a minute to resolve its DNS query. After several hours of mucking about (including two system restore rollbacks) I realized I needed to disable (or disable auto-start) the DNS Client service. Problem solved. Ah, the joys of late-night sleep-deprived computer administration!
I understand not everyone believes a large HOSTS file to be a worthwhile preventative measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo the commentator who said &#8220;throwing my hat in with the disabling service = improved performance&#8221;, but only when you&#8217;re careful about what you are doing.</p>
<p>I recently re-installed XP Home on one of my computers. I also installed a large HOSTS file as a prophylactic measure.</p>
<p>After that, my first web page access (after booting) would take half a minute to resolve its DNS query. After several hours of mucking about (including two system restore rollbacks) I realized I needed to disable (or disable auto-start) the DNS Client service. Problem solved. Ah, the joys of late-night sleep-deprived computer administration!</p>
<p>I understand not everyone believes a large HOSTS file to be a worthwhile preventative measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Bott</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2008/08/windows-performance-tweaking-myths-busted/comment-page-1/#comment-173679</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2096#comment-173679</guid>
		<description>Gregger,
You should use Process Explorer to figure out what service is using all that extra memory. It&#039;s certainly not normal. I suspend and resume all the time on a half-dozen machines here with no symptoms like the ones you describe.
 It sounds like that issue might be related to the second problem, in fact. In my case, I actually have *increased* the size of the System Restore reserved area, but I have tons of HDD space and feel it&#039;s best used. If you&#039;re starting to run out, your needs would be different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregger,</p>
<p>You should use Process Explorer to figure out what service is using all that extra memory. It&#8217;s certainly not normal. I suspend and resume all the time on a half-dozen machines here with no symptoms like the ones you describe.</p>
<p> It sounds like that issue might be related to the second problem, in fact. In my case, I actually have *increased* the size of the System Restore reserved area, but I have tons of HDD space and feel it&#8217;s best used. If you&#8217;re starting to run out, your needs would be different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregger</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2008/08/windows-performance-tweaking-myths-busted/comment-page-1/#comment-173678</link>
		<dc:creator>gregger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2096#comment-173678</guid>
		<description>What would really improve my Vista performance would be to not have a svchost.exe process that grows to a few GB of virtual memory over time if I suspend or hibernate once or twice.
Also, I improved my machine&#039;s performance by limiting the system restore size... it started to eat all my spare hard drive space with one image being over 12GB in size.
TTFN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would really improve my Vista performance would be to not have a svchost.exe process that grows to a few GB of virtual memory over time if I suspend or hibernate once or twice.</p>
<p>Also, I improved my machine&#8217;s performance by limiting the system restore size&#8230; it started to eat all my spare hard drive space with one image being over 12GB in size.</p>
<p>TTFN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The How-To Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2008/08/windows-performance-tweaking-myths-busted/comment-page-1/#comment-173677</link>
		<dc:creator>The How-To Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2096#comment-173677</guid>
		<description>Of course, I couldn&#039;t have written that without all the work you&#039;ve already done debunking them... more of a roundup of your work than anything else. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, I couldn&#8217;t have written that without all the work you&#8217;ve already done debunking them&#8230; more of a roundup of your work than anything else. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

