<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One less reason to use Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2006/09/one-less-reason-to-use-firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2006/09/one-less-reason-to-use-firefox/</link>
	<description>I write stuff. Mostly about Windows. Sometimes I get paid for it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2006/09/one-less-reason-to-use-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-141651</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 03:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1455#comment-141651</guid>
		<description>Ed,
Anyway to push this to the Devs in a significant way? This is one of the few things with IE7 that was lacking. The Default search box is very weak. This inline search should be simple to impliment and the Highlight feature is very valuable. I think it would be a very big mistake to pass this up for IE7 final.
Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,</p>
<p>Anyway to push this to the Devs in a significant way? This is one of the few things with IE7 that was lacking. The Default search box is very weak. This inline search should be simple to impliment and the Highlight feature is very valuable. I think it would be a very big mistake to pass this up for IE7 final.</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew K</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2006/09/one-less-reason-to-use-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-140152</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 06:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1455#comment-140152</guid>
		<description>Awesome find Ed. Anyway to get the IE team to add this in for the final release?
Paul,
Too bad the attributes it does not render properly are nonexistent on the web in any substantial numbers. Need I remind you of Firefox&#039;s poor showing in Standards Support and Acid2?
www.FirefoxMyths.com
Firefox Extensions are IMO highly overrated. I spend all my time simply adding extensions that now come default in other browsers just to make it useable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome find Ed. Anyway to get the IE team to add this in for the final release?</p>
<p>Paul,</p>
<p>Too bad the attributes it does not render properly are nonexistent on the web in any substantial numbers. Need I remind you of Firefox&#8217;s poor showing in Standards Support and Acid2?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.FirefoxMyths.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.FirefoxMyths.com</a></p>
<p>Firefox Extensions are IMO highly overrated. I spend all my time simply adding extensions that now come default in other browsers just to make it useable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someone</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2006/09/one-less-reason-to-use-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-139683</link>
		<dc:creator>someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 05:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1455#comment-139683</guid>
		<description>Microsoft should rewrite a fresh new plugin/addon platform and API or relaunch their existing plugin API..do some advertising and attract developers to write add-ons for IE. The only thing good about Firefox is its rendering engine capabilities and addons. The IE7 team will catch up sooner or later on standards, but as of today Firefox has a complete ecosystem of most of the web tasks a person does online with its addons. Take a look for Live Writer for instance, it isn&#039;t exactly a world-shaking application, but quite useful with its base functions and the rich set of plugins developers are writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft should rewrite a fresh new plugin/addon platform and API or relaunch their existing plugin API..do some advertising and attract developers to write add-ons for IE. The only thing good about Firefox is its rendering engine capabilities and addons. The IE7 team will catch up sooner or later on standards, but as of today Firefox has a complete ecosystem of most of the web tasks a person does online with its addons. Take a look for Live Writer for instance, it isn&#8217;t exactly a world-shaking application, but quite useful with its base functions and the rich set of plugins developers are writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stamatiou</title>
		<link>http://www.edbott.com/weblog/2006/09/one-less-reason-to-use-firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-139414</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stamatiou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1455#comment-139414</guid>
		<description>Too bad IE7 isn&#039;t compatible or doesn&#039;t properly render something like 36% of CSS attributes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad IE7 isn&#8217;t compatible or doesn&#8217;t properly render something like 36% of CSS attributes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

