More on RSS versus feeds

Mike Torres spent a few minutes putting together a list of companies that don’t use the term RSS. Firefox. Bloglines. SixApart. Etc. He concludes:

I didn’t spend more than three minutes because after about three minutes, I realized Microsoft isn’t trying to rename RSS and I stopped.  RSS stopped being used long ago…

Conclusion: RSS is a great technology and a lousy brand. If you want people to actually use the technology, you need to find a better way to explain it to them.

(Background here.)

One Response to More on RSS versus feeds

  • Ryan Walters says:

    It’s a lousy brand, but it’s also lousy terminology. The term RSS doesn’t encompass the variety of web feeds out there now: e.g. ATOM is not RSS, but it IS a “web feed.”

Hosted by A2

A2 Hosting does PHP5, MySQL5, PostgreSQL 8, cPanel, Ruby on Rails, and SSH/Shell.
I use them because I like dealing with responsive, friendly human beings.
Plans from $2.95/month.
  • Congrats to @harrymccracken for his new editorial gig RT @gchiemingo TIME is on his side (too easy) 3 hours ago
  • Google-branded streaming media device coming http://t.co/eyTnRdNQ via @WSJ 3 hours ago
  • "As an in-depth engineering dialog, we tend to favor the long form for Building Windows 8 posts" 8,617 words on Windows on Arm 6 hours ago
  • Sinofsky: "WOA includes desktop versions of the new Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote" 6 hours ago
  • Sinofsky: Windows on ARM (WOA) includes "if you wish, the Windows desktop w/ tools like Windows File Explorer and desktop Internet Explorer" 6 hours ago